Quoting%20commentary for Bava Batra 218:7

אמר רבא בר רב חנן לא גברא דשמיה לוי אי הכי היינו דקאמר מיכה (שופטים יז, יג) עתה ידעתי כי ייטיב ה' לי כי היה לי הלוי לכהן אין דאיתרמי ליה גברא דשמיה לוי

[he may have been] a man whose name was Levi.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' [H] may be rendered as both 'Levite' and 'Levi'. ');">²³</span> If so, [is] this [the reason] why Micah said, 'Now know I that the Lord will do me good, seeing I have a Levite as my priest'?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If the young man were not of the tribe of Levi, would Micah have been so glad in having secured a mere layman as his priest? ');">²⁴</span> — Yes; [he was glad] that he happened to obtain a man whose name was Levi. But was Levi his name? Surely his name was Jonathan, for it is said, And Jonathan the son of Gershom, the son of Manasseh, he and his sons were priests to the tribe of the Danites?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Judg. XVIII, 30. The Danites appropriated Micah's graven and molten images, his ephod and teraphim, and took also with them the young man who was his priest. ');">²⁵</span> — He said unto him: But [even] according to your argument, [it may be objected], 'Was he the son of Manasseh? Surely he was the son of Moses, for it is written, the son of Moses: Gershom, and Eliezer';<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I Chron. XXIII, 15. ');">²⁶</span>

Explore quoting%20commentary for Bava Batra 218:7. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.